Skip to main content

Words, pronouns and other things that keep writers awake

I have always liked words. This is probably because I am a writer, which means I spend an unreasonable amount of time arguing with myself over whether a sentence needs a comma. I also get emotionally attached to words that other people apparently have decided are no longer safe for public consumption.

Take “chick.” I recently heard Dire Straits’ 1985 song “Money for Nothing,” which includes the immortal line, “Money for nothing and chicks for free.” It was written as a parody of the rock-star lifestyle. I laughed. Then I thought: There is absolutely no way that lyric makes it through today’s cultural airport security without somebody confiscating it. “Chick” might be offensive. Unless it is the name of an all-female band. Then it’s apparently fine. Unless the band is the Dixie Chicks. Then “chick” is OK, but “Dixie” has to go. So now they are The Chicks.

And then there are pronouns. He. Him. She. Her. They. I am not making a political statement here. I am simply a grammar guy trying to keep up. I grew up believing “they” referred to more than one person. Apparently, “they” has since received a promotion. My old grammar books are going to need therapy.

Growing up in small-town Iowa in the 1970s, I learned a lot about the world by watching television. Shows such as “The Jeffersons,” “Good Times” and “Sanford and Son” introduced me to people whose lives and experiences were different from mine. They also taught me that racist words were wrong. Some of the words I heard as a kid were new to me, but they were not new to my friends who had been called them. That made a lasting impression. Words, it turns out, can be tiny packages containing enormous amounts of baggage.

George Carlin famously had a routine about seven words you could not say on television. In the 1970s, those words were considered outrageous. Today, you hear most of them regularly. I will not print them here because my sister reads this column, and there are some lines a little brother does not cross.

Then came “woke,” which somehow became a word capable of starting an argument before the person saying it even finished the sentence.

My point is that words matter. They can educate. They can entertain. They can offend. They can heal. They can make you laugh. They can make you cry. But perhaps the bigger issue is not whether words themselves have changed. It is whether we have forgotten that the person on the other side of the word is more important than the word itself.

So, I will keep writing. I will keep learning. I will try not to offend anyone. And I will continue to use commas correctly, even if it kills me. Because if we ever reach the point where a comma becomes politically controversial, I’m moving to Canada.

Have a teriffic Tuesday and thanks for reading.

Shane Goodman
Editor and Publisher
Times Vedette digital newsletter
shane@gctimesnews.com
641-332-2707

Maybe we should save those sick days

What does it mean to be truly sick? If you are not sure, spend some time with someone battling cancer. That is not just being sick. That is pain, suffering, uncertainty and a level of toughness the rest of us can only imagine — and hopefully never have to experience firsthand.

Meanwhile, the rest of us are occasionally laid low by a headache, the sniffles, an upset stomach or allergies. We act as though we have been struck by a medical catastrophe. Maybe we need a dose of our own medicine.

A 2023 Statista report found that among U.S. adults who worked or attended school, more than three-fourths had taken sick leave during the previous 12 months. That means sick days are pretty common.

Of course, we all know someone who seemingly never takes one.

Several decades ago, I worked with an incredibly loyal man at a printing plant I managed. He never took a sick day. If he was sick, none of us ever heard about it. He took tremendous pride in being dependable to his employer and his co-workers.

I also knew a young man during his senior year of high school who had perfect attendance throughout his entire school career. He was a good student and a good athlete, but he was equally proud of that attendance record. Then he became seriously ill one day and could not go to school. He was devastated. Not because he was sick, but because he had missed school.

That kind of commitment is admirable. But somewhere between “I never miss work” and “I have a sniffle, so I am taking three days off,” there has to be a reasonable middle ground.

COVID-19 certainly changed how many people view staying home when they are sick. Workplace policies have changed, too. Some people believe today’s employees are simply more willing to use their sick time. Others believe we have become a softer generation that needs an excuse to stay home. And, yes, we all know people who seem determined to use every sick hour they have. “I earned it.” “They owe me.” “I am entitled to it.” The problem comes when those same people burn through their sick time early in the year with a series of sniffles, headaches and mysterious illnesses — and then come down with something serious in November. Suddenly, the sniffles look pretty inexpensive.

The U.S. Department of Labor says federal law does not require employers to provide paid sick leave. Still, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reports that 78% of civilian workers have access to paid sick leave. That leaves 22% who do not.

So, if you are fortunate enough to have sick time, appreciate it. Use it when you genuinely need it. Stay home when you are contagious. And if you are healthy enough to go to work, go to work. Because sometimes the best use of a sick day is not using it at all.

Have a fantastic Friday and thanks for reading.

Shane Goodman
Editor and Publisher
Times Vedette digital newsletter
shane@gctimesnews.com
641-332-2707

A place for everything, and everything in its place

You probably heard the expression “A place for everything, and everything in its place.” It has been attributed to everyone from Samuel Smiles to Isabella Beeton to Benjamin Franklin. A lot of people throughout history have apparently had strong opinions about where things belong. I discovered that people tend to fall into one of two camps: Those who live by that philosophy and those who consider it a personal attack.

My appreciation for organization goes back to the late 1990s, when I met David Belin in his Des Moines law office. Belin was the senior partner in the Belin Law Firm and had an impressive resume, including serving as an attorney for the Warren Commission and the Rockefeller Commission. He also was a partner in our publishing company back then. But what I remember most was his office.

There were stacks of papers everywhere. Not little stacks. I’m talking knee-high stacks on the floor surrounding his desk. As I stood there trying to figure out how a human being could possibly find anything, Mr. Belin looked at me and said, “I have something for you.” He reached into one of those stacks and pulled out a piece of paper from somewhere in the middle. I was stunned. It was like watching a magician pull a tablecloth out from underneath a fully set dinner table — except this magician was retrieving a legal document, and the tablecloth was 18 inches of paperwork.

Somehow, he knew exactly where everything was. My brain doesn’t work that way. I am more Benjamin Franklin than David Belin. That becomes particularly obvious each time Jolene and I move to another home. Many of you can likely relate. Living out of boxes and between two houses makes finding a pair of socks feel like an archaeological expedition.

Silverware disappears. Screwdrivers go missing. Items I own enjoy an extended vacation. Those situations have me out of sorts. Thank goodness, Jolene deals with them much better than I do. Unfortunately, the organizational tendencies I inherited from my mother keep making regular appearances. I discovered that when my environment is chaotic, my brain doesn’t respond with, “Relax. It will all work out.” It says, “Where is the 10-millimeter socket?”

So, I found a temporary solution when situations like this arrive. I spend a few hours in the garage putting tools away and getting things organized. It gives me something to do, gives my brain a chance to unwind and gives Jolene a break from me. Everybody wins.

Yes, I have learned — and I am continuing to learn — through all of this. Some people meditate; I put tools in drawers and call it therapy. Maybe there really is a place for everything, and everything in its place.

Shane Goodman
Editor and Publisher
Times Vedette digital newsletter
shane@gctimesnews.com
641-332-2707

A hair-raising number of color choices

Blondes. Brunettes. Redheads. I thought hair color was limited to those three. Boy, was I wrong.

For natural hair colors, that small number may be close. But if you are dying your hair, you have up to 1,000 different choices, according to fantasyhairlovers.com. No, I did not make up that website name. 

Burnt sienna. Cornflower blue. Dusty lavender. Kelly green. Metallic copper. Mustard yellow. Peacock blue. Sandy blonde. Seafoam green. Sunflower yellow. Zinc blonde.

Keep in mind I have never dyed my hair, and I don’t have plans to do so. Admittedly, I don’t have a lot of hair left to dye even if I wanted to, but I am OK with the gray that keeps creeping up my sideburns. Any hair on my head is good hair, I rationalize. 

I come from a family of redheaded Irish people, but my hair was actually brown in my younger years. Mom, on the other hand, was proud of her red hair. As she aged, she kept dying it dark red in our kitchen sink. Maybe it was chartreuse, or dusty rose. I don’t know. She was just trying to hold off the gray hairs, until she finally gave in. 

Human hair color is apparently the pigmentation of human hair follicles and shafts due to two types of melanin: eumelanin and pheomelanin. Coincidentally, I think those were the names of the two guys in Milli Vanilli. Maybe not. Anyway, the more melanin that is present, the darker the hair, apparently. Upon further study, I learned that the hair color tone depends on the ratio of black or brown eumelanin to yellow or red pheomelanin. I hope you got that all down, because I am not repeating it. 

I will repeat this, though, and I do quite often. I had a coworker with dark hair who had a goatee most of his adult life. When the hair color of his mini-beard started to turn gray, he decided to dye it black. What he didn’t expect was it to look like a mink. The jet black goatee was shaved off immediately.   

Some people opt to dye their hair purple, green or even gray. Or, maybe more accurately, pastel purple, mint green or lavender gray. I don’t get it, but I am probably not supposed to. I am not too far from permanently giving in to the Mr. Magoo look — natural vanilla.

Have a fantastic Friday, and thanks for reading.

 

Shane Goodman
Editor and Publisher
Times Vedette digital newsletter
shane@gctimesnews.com
641-332-2707

The culture of crime

Do our upbringings, teachings and closest influences shape our views on crime? Or is the decision to take from or harm others an innate response, something that is ingrained in us from birth? Nature or nurture? Or both?

Criminal defense lawyer Kenneth Padowitz has written about the cultural influence on crime, referencing everything from the heat hypothesis to the Southern culture of violence to the relationship between individualism and collectivism. I am not sure how much I buy into all of those connections, but it is an interesting discussion. The question becomes even more interesting when you look at the everyday decisions people make.

Why does one person think it is OK to loot a retail store while another person would not keep a $10 bill found on the ground? What makes someone think it is acceptable to steal merchandise from a company because “they can afford it,” while another person would not consider taking a pen or a pad of paper from her employer?

You may have heard some people justify breaking into businesses and stealing because “they have insurance to cover it anyway.” Anyone who actually pays for insurance understands that claims, deductibles and premiums have a way of affecting everyone.

Some argue that it is understandable for people in need to steal baby formula, diapers or food. But when that same person walks out of a store with armloads of $200 sneakers, the argument becomes more difficult to defend.

And despite all the headlines about crime, the latest national numbers offer some perspective. FBI data show violent crime decreased an estimated 4.5% in 2024, while property crime declined 8.1%. In 2025, the FBI reported that the violent crime rate fell another 9.3%, the largest year-to-year decline in its national estimates since 1936.

That doesn’t mean crime is no longer a problem. The Bureau of Justice Statistics estimated 13.1 million property crime victimizations in 2024, while its survey found 23.3 violent victimizations per 1,000 people age 12 and older.

The bottom line is that it is not OK to steal. It is OK to ask for help. And I am continually amazed by how many people and organizations are willing to provide it. I am not talking about simply giving cash to someone on an exit ramp and hoping for the best. I am talking about helping people overcome addiction, find housing, get food and obtain the services they need before desperation or addiction contributes to more serious crimes. Easier said than done, I know.

We undoubtedly have a culture problem when it comes to how some people view crime. Is it nature? Nurture? Both? Does it matter? W. Edwards Deming, the father of continuous quality improvement, often said that instead of counting dead fish at the end of the stream, we should go upstream and find out what is killing them. That theory applies to crime, too.

The numbers may be moving in the right direction, but crime will not decrease simply because we want it to. If we want fewer victims, we need to look upstream at the conditions, choices and culture that contribute to crime in the first place.

Have a terriffic Tuesday, and thanks for reading.

 

Shane Goodman
Editor and Publisher
Times Vedette digital newsletter
shane@gctimesnews.com
641-332-2707

What will we tell them?

We often hear our parents or grandparents tell us how things were done in their day, and we marvel at how much has changed in such a relatively short time.

Imagine walking through a foot of snow to use the outhouse when nature called. Or riding a horse into town because that was your only transportation. Or gathering around a wood stove in the middle of the house because that was the heat source. I remember my mother telling stories like these. At the time, they seemed ancient. Looking back, they really weren’t that long ago. It makes me wonder what stories we will tell future generations about the things we do today.

How about telling time on a standard wall clock? You know — the big hand, the little hand and the frantic moment when you are trying to determine whether you are 10 minutes early or 50 minutes late. I recently saw a post about a student who was asked by a teacher to draw a clock showing 10 minutes after 11. The student drew a digital clock reading “11:10.” Sigh.

Then there is money. I was paying cash at a sandwich shop the other day, and my change was automatically deposited into a little metal bowl attached to the register. I asked the clerk how many customers still pay with cash. He guessed about 20%. The latest Federal Reserve data show cash accounted for about 16% of consumer payments in 2023, down from 31% in 2016. Cards now dominate the payment landscape.

I vividly recall learning how to count change in school. One has to wonder whether that is still taught — and whether it needs to be. I remember taking my then-4-year-old daughter Samantha to a store when she wanted to buy something with her own money. She did not know the difference between a dime and a dollar, so she kept pulling coins from her little purse and putting them up on the counter until the clerk told her she had enough. I smiled. Samantha was beaming. She had bought something with her own money, and that was all that mattered.

Then there are gasoline-powered vehicles. Many of us are reluctant to give up the internal-combustion engine, but the transition to electric vehicles is real. In 2025, electric vehicles accounted for about 10% of U.S. car sales, according to the International Energy Agency. Will the gasoline engine eventually become as outdated as the horse and buggy? Maybe. I suspect Grandpa would have laughed at the idea of a horse being replaced by a machine. And someday, our grandchildren may laugh at us for driving vehicles that required us to stop, insert a nozzle and pump liquid fuel into them. Just as we laugh at the outhouse. Progress has a funny way of making yesterday’s normal look downright ridiculous.

Someday, somebody will probably look back at us and wonder how we ever survived with a wall clock that needed batteries, a credit card that had to be swiped, and a car that ran on gasoline. I just hope they remember that we were darn good at making change.

Have a fantastic Friday, and thanks for reading.

Shane Goodman
Editor and Publisher
Times Vedette digital newsletter
shane@gctimesnews.com
641-332-2707